检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院,上海200030 [2]成都理工大学文法学院,四川成都610059
出 处:《华东经济管理》2012年第7期31-35,共5页East China Economic Management
摘 要:在我国,地方政府是公共服务提供的主导者,而地方官员在公共服务中扮演重要角色。文章构建了1997—2010年我国省级领导与其省份公共服务提供相匹配的数据,从个人微观层面考察这些官员群体(尤其是政府行政首长)对公共服务提供的情况。研究结果表明:省级官员建设公共服务型政府的愿望并不强烈,并且存在"捕蝇纸效应";官员的公共服务支出与他们的晋升相关性低;东部地区公共服务支出比例明显低于广大的中西部地区;官员的流动有利于公共服务的提供。因此,创造公共服务的"竞争性市场",并增强政策的可信承诺;进行税制改革,增加地方财力;增强社会问责,强化地方官员的约束。In China,local government is the leader in providing public services,and the local officials play an important role in the public service.This paper constructs a matchable data system of Chinese provinces leadership and the provincial public services from 1997 to 2010,study the public service provided by official groups(especially the executive heads of government) in the individual micro-level.The results as follows,firstly,the provincial government officials’desire of constructing pub lic service oriented government is not strong,and there exits"flypaper effect".Secondly,officials’public service expendi tures are associated with their promotion lowly.Thirdly,the public services expenditure proportion in eastern regions is signif icantly lower than the central and western regions.Finally,the flow of officials is good for the provision of public services.Therefore,it should create public services of"competitive market",enhance the credibility of policy commitments,take tax reform,increase local financial resources,enhance social accountability,and strengthen the constraints of local officials.
分 类 号:F062.6[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222