检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕晖[1] 李云飞[1] 罗五金[1] 项莉[1] 王静[1]
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院,武汉430030
出 处:《医学与社会》2012年第5期59-62,共4页Medicine and Society
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年基金(70903023)
摘 要:目的:分析我国农村现行医疗保障制度住院补偿的效果,对其中医保制度设计存在的问题进行探讨。方法:通过入户调查收集农村居民的相关信息,分别对不同医保形式、不同住院流向农村居民的住院补偿情况进行分析。结果:不同医保覆盖农村居民的住院率间具有显著差异(2=16.231,<0.05);不同医保制度的住院补偿比例具有显著差异(2=33.173,<0.05);不同住院流向参合居民的补偿比例随着住院层次的提升而显著降低(2=58.527,<0.05)。讨论:现行农村医保制度设计在有效发挥作用,并在一定程度上抑制居民合理的卫生服务需求。同时,不同医保制度的补偿比例在参保人群中具有一定的"利富"效应。Objective: To analyze inpatient compensation effects of current rural medical security system and explore the existing system design problems. Methods: The relevant information about rural residents was collected through household survey, and the inpatient compen- sation among rural residents covered by different medical insurances and flowing to different levels of medical institutions was analyzed re- spectively. Results: There were significant differences among hospitalization rates of rural residents covered by different medical insurances ~2~I6.231, P〈0.05) and inpatient compensation ratios of different medical insurances (Z2=33.173, P〈0.05); the compensation ratio among re- sidents covered by NCMS would significantly reduced along with the level of hospitalization raised (Z2~58.527, P〈0.05). Discussion: At the same time of working effectively, current rural medical insurance system could restrain the reasonable health service demand at some degree because of designing. And the compensation ratios among different medical insurances had some "pro-rich" effect in covered residents.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.54.133