检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:成婧[1] 吴发启[1] 路培[1] 王健[1] 云峰[1] 吴光艳[1]
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西杨凌712100
出 处:《水土保持研究》2012年第3期54-57,共4页Research of Soil and Water Conservation
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(40871133);国家重点基础研究发展"973"计划(2007CB407201)
摘 要:为了在种植作物的同时减少水土流失,采用玉米苜蓿间作的种植模式,研究其蓄水保土效益。试验对玉米苜蓿间作与单作玉米的土壤含水量,径流量以及产沙量进行观测,进而研究两者的蓄水保土效益。结果表明:玉米苜蓿间作地的土壤含水量大于玉米单作地的土壤含水量;玉米苜蓿间作的径流量和产沙量均小于玉米单作,说明了玉米苜蓿能够有效地减少径流的冲刷侵蚀,具有良好的拦沙性能;经计算得出玉米苜蓿间作的蓄水效益为87%,保土效益为98%,表明玉米苜蓿间作的蓄水保土效益显著。In order to grow crops while reducing soil erosion, cropping patterns, maize intercropped with alfalfa, was used to study soil and water conservation benefits. Soil moisture, runoff and sediment yield of intercropping patterns for maize and alfalfa and monoculture maize were observed and both soil and water conser- vation benefits were studied. The results showed that soil moisture of intercropping patterns for maize and alfalfa was more than monoculture maize in soil moisture; runoff and sediment yield of intercropping patterns for maize and alfalfa were less than that of maize monoculture, which indicated that intercropping patterns for maize and alfalfa could effectively reduce runoff erosion and had a good performance of sediment reduc tion; The water storage efficiency of intercropping patterns for maize and alfalfa was 87%, soil conservation efficiency was 98%, which indicated that soil and water conservation benefits of intercropping patterns for maize and alfalfa were significant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.115.102