透视避风港原则合理注意义务的认定问题  

View on the Identification of Reasonable Attention Duty Upon Safe Harbor Rule

作　　者：张冬[1] 刘敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工程大学,哈尔滨150001

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2012年第1期63-66,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

基　　金：国家软科学研究计划(2010GXS5D201);黑龙江省教育厅人文社科研究项目(11554087);黑龙江省人力资源和社会保障厅留学回国人员科技项目择优资助优秀课题阶段性成果

摘　　要：后危机时代,视频网站行业的知识产权竞争及争议日益激烈,而与之相关的国际通用的"避风港"原则是否完全适用于国内新兴网络产业的疑问,涉及网络服务提供者、著作权人及最终消费者的利益平衡问题。土豆网胜诉案,凸显了我国侵权责任法合理注意义务的重要地位。然而,与美国Digital Millenium Copyright Act(DM-CA)数字千年著作权法案中"通知与删除"程序对避风港原则合理注意义务规定相比,我国避风港原则对该义务的立法认定尚属模糊。对此,应当细化对网络服务合理行为的法律认定标准,包括对著作权人滥用通知共同侵权责任的认定、国家自主研发的网络过滤软件之推广、合理注意义务作为网络服务提供者过错标准的认定,以及网络著作权统一管理体系的创建等关键问题。At post-crisis age,international and domestic Intellectual Property challenge and disputes have been intensive.The relevant issue of whether the principle of Safe Harbor Rule match to the development of China new industry of website,should involve in the interests balance of website service provider,copyright owner and final customers.The case of Tudou has showed the important rule of reasonable attention duty in tort liability law in China.However,our Safe Harbor Rule is still vague comparing with the relevant regulations in Digital Millenium Copyright Act（DMCA） in the United States.Thus we should refine the identification standards of reasonable action in website service.It should include such key issues as the identification of copyright owner notice abuse to common tort abilities,the popularization of national owing website filter software,the identification of website provider＇s fault abilities upon reasonable attention and the establishment of united arrangement of website copyright.

关 键 词：避风港原则 合理注意义务的认定 网络服务提供者 利益平衡 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]