增设诉讼诈骗罪的立法构想——以诈骗罪的对比研究为视角  

The Legislation Conception of Additionally Building the litigation Swindling Crime——Take the contrast research with cheating crime as the angle of view

作　　者：安文霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2012年第2期34-37,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：诉讼诈骗虽然与诈骗罪有某些共同之处,但是它们的区别更为明显。在欺诈行为、欺诈行为的含义、欺诈行为的行为方式;对方的错误;交付行为;财产的交付与损害的发生上都与诈骗罪有很大差异。因此将诉讼诈骗行为认定其构成诈骗罪是不妥当的。诉讼诈骗行为的独特性和极大的社会危害性,要求立法作出相应独立的评价。Although litigation swindles and crimes of swindling have something in common,the differences between them are more distinct.Litigation swindles are quite different from crimes of swindling in swindling acts,implications of swindling acts,ways of swindling acts,the opposing party＇s mistakes,actus traditions,delivery of properties and the occurrences of damage.Therefore,it is not valid to regard litigation swindling acts as crimes of swindling.The particularity and huge social harmfulness urge legislation to give corresponding independent evaluation.

关 键 词：诉讼诈骗 诈骗罪 刑事立法 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]