检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中外医学研究》2012年第13期15-16,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:分析比较腹腔镜手术(LA)与传统开腹手术(OA)治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效。方法:186例急性阑尾炎患者,根据手术方式不同分为两组,观察组96例采用LA治疗,对照组90例采用OA治疗,比较两种手术方法在手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、住院时间、住院综合费用及手术结果的差异。结果:观察组的术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间和住院时间明显少于于对照组,住院综合费用则明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组术后镇痛药使用、肠梗阻及切口感染例数明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或0.01)。结论:腹腔镜治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效明显优于开腹手术。Objective:To explore a reasonable treatment for acute appendicitis by comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy(LA) and operation appendectomy(OA).Methods:186 acute appendicitis patients in our department were retrospectively analyzed,186 cases were divided into two groups according to the operation method,96 cases in observation group were treated with LA and 90 cases in control group were treated with OA.To compare the two groups in terms of the operation time,the intraoperative blood loss,bowel exhaust time,postoperative hospital length of stay,the cost of hospitalizing and operation result.Results:The intraoperative blood loss,bowel exhaust time,postoperative hospital length of stay of the observation group were significantly lower than the control group(P0.01),the numbers of postoperative analgesic use,intestinal obstruction and wound infection of the observation group were significantly lower than the control group(P0.05 or 0.01).Conclusion:Laparoscopic treatment,which is feasible and safe,is significantly superior to OA in acute appendicitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.200.151