检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周勇[1] 王涛[1,2] 吕庆[1] 朱远乐[1] 王翔翔[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,武汉430072 [2]武汉大学水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,武汉430072
出 处:《长江科学院院报》2012年第5期51-56,61,共7页Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51079111;50879063);国家自然科学基金重大研究计划资助项目(90715042)
摘 要:在岩土工程的实践中,许多岩土体材料在载荷作用下表现出应变软化特性,因而在岩土工程数值模拟中如何更好地表现出岩土材料的应变软化特性非常关键。首先分析了"圆形孔洞问题"这一岩土工程领域的基本问题,并对该问题基于应变软化模型建立的现有理论解与FLAC3D的数值计算结果进行了对比,所得到的结果验证了FLAC3D应变软化模型在数值计算时的准确性和适用性。接着采用FLAC3D程序中的应变软化模型与理想弹塑性模型对该问题进行了计算,通过对计算结果的对比分析,认为忽略应变软化岩土材料的强度软化特性对工程是偏于危险的。最后对FLAC3D中应变软化模型的相关参数(εpi、残余系数)进行了研究。研究成果有助于研究人员更深入地理解岩石应变软化模型的力学本质。Many of rock and soil materials exhibit strain softening behaviour under load in geotechnical engineering practice.To show the strain softening properties of geotechnical material is crucial in the numerical simulation of geotechnical engineering.Based on previous researches,the authors analyze the circular cavity expansion problem which is one of the basic problems in geotechnical engineering,and compares the results of theoretical solution of strain softening model with FLAC3D numerical calculations.The comparison confirms the accuracy and applicability of strain softening model in FLAC3D numerical calculation.Moreover,the numerical results obtained from computations by strain softening model and elastic-perfectly plastic constitutive model are compared.Results show that the strength softening of strain softening geotechnical materials could not afford to be ignored.Finally,the related parameters(εpi and η) of strain softening model are analyzed.The research results could help researchers understand the nature of mechanics in strain softening model of rocks in the numerical calculation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28