检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东大学附属省立医院,山东济南250021 [2]山东大学公共卫生学院
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志(上旬刊)》2012年第6期15-17,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨循证护理对碘(131I)美妥昔单抗注射液(利卡汀)联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗肝癌患者的的影响。方法:将62例肝癌患者随机分为实验组32例和对照组30例。实验组给予循证护理,对照组给予常规护理。干预2周后比较两组护理前后汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分情况及临床疗效。结果:实验组护理后HAMA评分为(7.51±2.65)分,对照组为(9.02±2.78)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组治疗有效率为87.5%,对照组为63.3%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:循证护理可明显缓解利卡汀联合TACE治疗肝癌患者的焦虑情绪,提高临床疗效,值得临床推广应用。Objective:To investigate the impact of evidence - based nursing care in the treatment of liver cancer patients with Licartin combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization ( TACE). Methods:62 liver cancer patients were randomly divided into an experimental group ( n = 32 ) and a control group ( n = 30 ). The patients in the experimental group received the evidence - based nursing care and the patients in the control group were given routine nursing care. After the intervention for 2 weeks, HAMA scores and clinical curative effect were compared between the two groups before and after nursing care. Results : The HAMA scores were ( 7.51 ± 2.65 ) in the experimental group and ( 9.02 ± 2.78 ) in the control group respectively, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; the effective rate was 87.5 % and 63.3 % in the experimental group and in the control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : The evi- dence - based nursing care can significantly relieve patient's anxiety and improve clinical curative effect in the treatment of liver cancer patients with Licartin combined with TACE.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229