循证护理对利卡汀联合TACE治疗肝癌患者的影响  被引量:4

Impact of evidence-based nursing care in the treatment of liver cancer patients with Licartin combined with TACE

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:赵小茜[1] 王萍[1] 姜宝法[2] 

机构地区:[1]山东大学附属省立医院,山东济南250021 [2]山东大学公共卫生学院

出  处:《齐鲁护理杂志(上旬刊)》2012年第6期15-17,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing

摘  要:目的:探讨循证护理对碘(131I)美妥昔单抗注射液(利卡汀)联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗肝癌患者的的影响。方法:将62例肝癌患者随机分为实验组32例和对照组30例。实验组给予循证护理,对照组给予常规护理。干预2周后比较两组护理前后汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分情况及临床疗效。结果:实验组护理后HAMA评分为(7.51±2.65)分,对照组为(9.02±2.78)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组治疗有效率为87.5%,对照组为63.3%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:循证护理可明显缓解利卡汀联合TACE治疗肝癌患者的焦虑情绪,提高临床疗效,值得临床推广应用。Objective:To investigate the impact of evidence - based nursing care in the treatment of liver cancer patients with Licartin combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization ( TACE). Methods:62 liver cancer patients were randomly divided into an experimental group ( n = 32 ) and a control group ( n = 30 ). The patients in the experimental group received the evidence - based nursing care and the patients in the control group were given routine nursing care. After the intervention for 2 weeks, HAMA scores and clinical curative effect were compared between the two groups before and after nursing care. Results : The HAMA scores were ( 7.51 ± 2.65 ) in the experimental group and ( 9.02 ± 2.78 ) in the control group respectively, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; the effective rate was 87.5 % and 63.3 % in the experimental group and in the control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : The evi- dence - based nursing care can significantly relieve patient's anxiety and improve clinical curative effect in the treatment of liver cancer patients with Licartin combined with TACE.

关 键 词:循证护理 利卡汀 肝动脉化疗栓塞术 肝癌 焦虑 

分 类 号:R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象