检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫燕妮[1]
机构地区:[1]辽宁对外经贸学院国际经济与贸易研究所,辽宁大连116052
出 处:《天津商业大学学报》2012年第3期57-61,共5页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
摘 要:承运人在目的港无正本提单放行货物的行为会严重损害提单持有人的经济利益,需要承担侵权或违约责任。然而,在无单放货案件的审判实践中,承运人总会从各方面寻求解除其责任的理由,给提单持有人权利的维护带来诸多障碍。本文通过分析典型案例,总结承运人在无单放货案例中常用的抗辩理由,进而提出相应的无单放货风险防范措施。Delivery goods without presentation of the original bills of lading at the port of destination will seriously damage the bill of lading holder' s economic interests. The carrier needs to assume tort liability or liability for the breach of contact. However, in the judicial practice, the carrier will always find a variety of justifications for exemption from the l!ability. These justifications become main obstacles for the bill of lading holders in the lawsuit. This paper puts forward the corresponding preventive measures through analyzing carrier' s justifications in typical cases about delivery goods without presentation of the original bills of lading.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7