检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王亚茹[1] 高建民[1] 闫苏 孙彦[2] 闫永亮[1] 赖莎[1]
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院,陕西西安710049 [2]西安交通大学医学院,陕西西安710061
出 处:《中国医院管理》2012年第5期29-31,共3页Chinese Hospital Management
基 金:西安市卫生局科研计划项目
摘 要:目的了解医院的偿债能力状况,制订合理的医院偿债能力评价方案,比较不同类别、不同级别医院偿债能力有无差异。方法采用主成分分析综合评价医院的偿债能力,采用方差分析比较3种不同类别医院的偿债能力有无差异,采用t检验比较2种不同级别医院的偿债能力有无差异。结果得出28所医院的偿债能力综合得分及排序,综合医院和中医院的偿债能力有显著差异,二级医院和三级医院的偿债能力差异不显著。结论主成分分析能够比较全面地评价医院的偿债能力,不同类别医院偿债能力之间的差异提示政府部门对此应采取相应对策。Objective To understand the debt-paying ability of public hospitals, to make reasonable evaluation scheme of hospital debt-paying ability, and to compare the differences of debt-paying ability among different categories of hos- pitals and different levels of hospitals. Methods Using main component analysis to comprehensively evaluate the ability of hospital debt-paying ability, using variance analysis to compare the differences of debt-paying ability among 3 different categories of hospitals and using t test to compare the differences of debt-paying ability between 2 different levels of hospitals. Results The composite scores of debt-paying ability of 28 hospitals are gained, and there are significant differences between the debt-paying ability of general hospitals and traditional Chinese medicine hospitals, and the differences be- tween the debt-paying ability of second-class hospitals and first-class hospitals are not significant. Conclusion Main component analysis can comprehensively evaluate the ability of hospital debt-paying. The differences of debt-paying ability among different categories of hospitals imply that the qovernment should adopt corresponding countermeasures.
关 键 词:公立医院 偿债能力 主成分分析 方差分析 T检验
分 类 号:R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.209