检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:麻玉秀[1] 乔军[1] 孟文文[1] 曹彩霞[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军总医院南楼心二科一病区,北京100853
出 处:《中国医药导刊》2012年第2期308-308,310,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
摘 要:目的:通过水银血压计和上臂式电子血压计两种不同测量方法的效果比较,找到方便快捷准确的测量血压方法。方法:将高龄高血压患者80例,进行自身对照,先用水银血压计测量,5分钟后再用电子血压计测量,比较前后所测的血压数值,及护士测血压耗时。结果:两种测血压方式所获得的结果无明显差异,电子血压计耗时明显低于水银血压计,P<0.05。结论:采用电子血压计测量血压准确又节时。Objective:To find more convenient,accurate and prompt way of measuring blood pressure by comparing the different measuring results of electronic sphygmomanometer and mercurial sphygmomanometer.Methods:To take 80 old patients with hypertension as samples,and use electronic sphygmomanometer for the first measurement,then take mercurial sphygmomanometer for the second measurement 5 minutes later.To compare the blood pressure values measured and the time consumed by the nurse for measurement.Results:There are no significant differences between the two different measurement methods,but time consumption of using electronic sphygmomanometer is significantly shorter than using mercurial sphygmomanometer(P0.05).Conclusions:Using electronic sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure is accurate and time-saving.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117