检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省科学院石油化学研究院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040
出 处:《黑龙江科学》2012年第3期44-46,共3页Heilongjiang Science
摘 要:对比了GB/T7124—2008胶黏剂拉伸剪切强度的测定与ASTMD1002—05拉伸法测定胶黏剂单搭接试件剪切强度,从几个方面分析了两种试验方法的差别以及对试验结果的影响,并由此得出同种胶黏剂分别采用以上方法试验得出的数据会有一定差异的结论,在对胶黏剂进行拉伸剪切强度复验时应当采用该胶黏剂出厂检验所采用的检测方法。Two methods were compared which were used for testing tension shear strength, one was GB/T 7124-2008 test method for tension shear strength for adhesives and the other one was ASTM D 1002-05 apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading. The differences between the two methods and effects on test results were analyzed from several aspects, h is concluded that there should be some differences between the determination data of tension shear strength of adhesives tested by these two methods respectively. Therefore when retest the tension shear strength of adhesives, the method which the manufactures apply for factory insoection should be emnloyed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.89.16