国家第六轮甘蔗品种区试云南瑞丽点DTOPSIS法综合评价  被引量:11

DTOPSIS Evaluation on the Sixth National Sugarcane Varieties Trial in Ruili of Yunnan

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:周清明[1] 桃联安[1] 杨李和[1] 董立华[1] 安汝东[1] 段惠芬[1] 朱建荣[1] 经艳芬[1] 

机构地区:[1]云南省农业科学院甘蔗研究所瑞丽育种站,瑞丽678600

出  处:《中国糖料》2012年第2期18-20,22,共4页Sugar Crops of China

基  金:农林动植物育种工程项目(2006BAD01A06-4-1);云南省面上基金(2007C236);农业部行业专项(nyhyzx07-019);科技支撑计划(2007BAD30B02);国家863计划(2007AA100701)

摘  要:利用DTOPSIS对参加国家甘蔗品种第六轮区试的13个品种,在云南瑞丽点两年新植1年宿根的品比结果,进行了综合分析,结果:闽糖95-261、福农99-20169、粤甘18号、福农02-3924、闽糖96-6016、桂引6号、粤甘16号、桂辐98-296、云蔗99-91九个品种的综合表现优于双对照ROC16(CK1)和粤糖93-159(CK2),适宜在湿热生态型蔗区推广应用;Rb76-5418的综合表现优于ROC16(CK1)。评价结果与糖产量排序基本一致,与甘蔗品种在云南瑞丽蔗区的实际表现吻合。Thirteen sugarcane lines of the sixth national sugarcane variety trials for two plantings and one rooting in Ruili of Yunnan were evaluated by Dynamic Technique of Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (DTOPSIS). The results showed that the varieties of MT95-261,FN99-20169,YG18,FN02-3924,MT96-6016, GY6,YG16,GF98-296 and YZ99-91 were suitable for popularizing application in damp-heat ecological sugarcane area because their comprehensive performances were better than that of ROCI6 (CK,) and YT93-159 (CK2). Meanwhile,Rb76-5418 was better than ROC16 (CKI) and the results of sugar yield were as the same as the order of actual sugar yield.

关 键 词:甘蔗 区域试验 DTOPSIS 评价 

分 类 号:S566.103[农业科学—作物学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象