检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁国威
出 处:《中医临床研究》2012年第8期75-76,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨活血散结法治疗前列腺增生症的临床疗效。方法:选取2008年2月~2010年2月在我院治疗的40例股骨粗隆间骨折患者,随机分为对照组(非那雄胺片治疗组)20例和观察组(活血散结法治疗组)20例,两组患者的基本资料方面比较,差异无统计学意义,具有可比性。结果:两组间疗效比较,研究组20例中,痊愈15例,好转3例,无效2例,总有效率为90.0%,对照组20例中,痊愈6例,好转10例,无效4例,总有效率为80.0%,差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。两组治疗前后膀胱残余尿量及夜尿次数比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且研究组恢复的情况明显优于对照组。讨论:活血散结法治疗前列腺增生症疗效显著,具有临床推广价值。Objective: To investigate the effects of the Huoxue sanjie method in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: From February 2008 to February 2010, 40 cases were selected and randomly divided into the control group (non-that male amines treatment group 20 cases) and the observation group (treatment group of Huoxue Sanjie method 20 cases), compared the basic information of the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant, and differentially are comparable. Results: The efficacy of the two group were compared: The research group of 20 cases, 15 cases were cured, 3 were improved, 2 cases were ineffective, the total effective rate was 90.0%, the control group of 20 cases, 6 cases were cured, 10 cases were improved, 4 cases were ineffective, the total effective rate was 80.0%, the difference was significant (P0.05), with statistical significance. The recovery of the research group was better than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: The Huoxue sanjie method was effective in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229