检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋颖[1] 陈敏纯[1] 贾艳艳[1] 鹿成韬[1] 关月[1] 李雪晴[1] 丁莉坤[1] 文爱东[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第四军医大学第一附属医院药剂科,陕西西安710032
出 处:《中国医院药学杂志》2012年第10期775-779,共5页Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:建立液-质联用测定人血浆中多潘立酮的浓度,研究多潘立酮口腔崩解片与多潘立酮片的人体药动学及相对生物利用度。方法:血浆样品中加入内标盐酸苯海拉明,经甲醇沉淀蛋白,采用液-质联用测定。用建立的方法测定18例男性健康志愿者单剂量口服受试制剂(多潘立酮口腔崩解片)或参比制剂(多潘立酮片)后的血药浓度,求得药动学参数,并对2种制剂的生物等效性进行评价。结果:在0.100~50 ng·mL-1内呈良好的线性关系,方法回收率79.2%~87.8%,日内、日间RSD均小于15%。单次口服10 mg受试制剂或参比制剂后的Cmax分别为(20.5±7.6)和(15.8±6.1)ng·mL-1;tmax分别为(0.79±0.21)和(0.68±0.31)h;t1/2分别为(9.92±2.02)和(9.50±1.61)h;AUC(0-36)分别为(84.3±26.2)和(71.0±15.0)h·ng·mL-1;AUC(0-∞)分别为(89.8±28.2)和(74.6±16.4)h·ng·mL-1。受试制剂对参比制剂的相对生物利用度为(113.5±10.3)%。结论:该方法灵敏,无杂质干扰。测得的受试制剂与参比制剂的主要药动学参数之间无明显差异,表明2种制剂在人体内生物等效。OBJECTIVE To determine domperidone in human plasma by LC-MS/MS method, and to investigate its pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability. METHODS Domperidone concentrations in plasma extracted with being precipitated protein by methanol were determinated by LC-MS/MS. The test formulations(domperidone orally disintegrating tablets)and reference formulations(domperidone tablets) were given to 18 healthy male volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of test formula- tions (domperidone orally disin-tegrating tablets) and reference formulations and the bioequivalence of the two formulations were evaluated. RESULTS The calibration curve was linear within the range of 0. 100 - 50 ng.mL-1. The method recovery was 79. 20//00 - 87. 8%. RSDs of intra-day and inter-day were less than 15%. After a single oral dose of 10 mg the test or reference formulations, the main pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: Cmax (20. 5 ± 7. 6) and (15.8 ± 6. l ) ng· mL-1 ;tmax (0. 79 ± 0. 21) and (0. 68 ± 0. 31)h; tl/2 (9. 92 ± 2. 02) and (9. 50 ± 1.61)h; AUC((k36) (84. 3 ± 26. 2) and (71.0 ± 15.0)h·ng·mL- 1 AUC(0-∞) (89. 8 ± 28.2) and (74. 6 ± 16. 4) h·ng·mL- 1, respectively. Relative bioavailability was ( 113.5 ± 10. 3) %. CONCLUSION The method was sensitive with no endogenous interference. No significant difference exists among the main pharmacokinetic parameters for the test and reference tablets. The two formulations are bioequivalence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222