国家文化治理:发展文化产业的新维度  

National Cultural Governance:New Dimension of Developing Cultural Industries

作　　者：胡惠林[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学国家文化产业创新与发展研究基地,上海200030

出　　处：《学术月刊》2012年第5期28-32,共5页Academic Monthly

基　　金：教育部哲学社会研究重大课题攻关项目"我国文化产业发展略研究"(08JZD0034)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：寻求人类社会发展的新的文明发展方式和生活方式,转变人类财富的增长方式,是人类社会共同追求的目标。文化产业被认为是最能体现这一价值追求的实现方式。于是,文化产业在社会发展的层面上和全球化治理的层面上便超越了法兰克福学派作为社会批判理论的"文化工业论",转而成为用以克服和解决经济和社会发展问题的治理工具和治理手段。中国在经历了政治治理("以阶级斗争为纲")、经济治理("以经济建设为中心")之后,正在走向文化治理("建设社会主义文化强国")。通过发展文化产业,克服与解决国家发展困境,建构国家文化治理,成为中国发展文化产业和实现建设文化强国的战略出发点和新维度。国家文化治理的核心在于:发展文化产业的目的不是为了经济,而是为了完善国家治理,是以经济——市场经济的方式实现文化的政治、经济、社会和文化的价值性转换,进而改变和重塑国家治理模式。It is common goals of human society to pursue new civilization model and life style, and to shift growth pattern of human wealth. Cultural industries are regarded as the most suitable realization model of seeking this value. Therefore, cultural industries are beyond Frankfurt School of critical comments at social development and global governance level, while which is the governance tool and means to overcome and solve the economic and social issues. Since political governance and economic governance are undergone successively, cultural governance is coming in China. By developing cultural industries to overcome and solve the straits in the development of the country, national cultural governance is constructed as the strategic start pointing of developing cultural industries and building cultural power. The aim of developing cultural industries is not for economy, but for improving national governance, namely achieving cultural value conversion by market economic mode, and further changing and rebuilding national governance mode, which just is the core of national cultural governance theory.

关 键 词：国家治理 文化治理 文化产业治理性 国家文化治理 

分 类 号：G124[文化科学]