基于AHP和TOPSIS的高校科研团队绩效评价研究  

Research on Evaluation Model of HEI Scientific and Technology Research Team Performance Evaluation Based on AHP and TOPSIS

作　　者：包含丽[1] 郑伟[2] 韦小青[3] 

机构地区：[1]温州大学国际合作学院,浙江温州325035 [2]温州大学机电工程学院,浙江温州325035 [3]温州大学党校办,浙江温州325035

出　　处：《科技管理研究》2012年第10期114-117,127,共5页Science and Technology Management Research

基　　金：国侨办基金项目"基于数字网络环境下的华侨华人资料数据库的研究与开发"(GQBQ2009015);温州大学校级教改课题"突出汽车电子重要地位的汽车维修工程课程改革"([2010]123);温州大学创业教育专项科研课题"以科技创新能力培养为核心的理工科学生创业教育途径研究"(2009ZX07);温州文化研究工程课题"开放视野下课外学术科技活动体系与温州地方高校大学生创新能力培养途径研究"(Wyk11082)

摘　　要：建立了高校科研团队绩效评价指标体系,提出了基于层次分析法(AHP)和逼近理想求解的排序法(TOPSIS)的高校科研团队绩效评价模型,利用AHP确定评价指标的权重、TOPSIS排序法,计算正、负理想解和接近度;依据接近度对高校科研团队绩效评价指标进行比较,并进行了实例分析。分析结果表明:论文构建的科研团队评价指标体系具有一定的实用性,为高校科研团队绩效提供了一种评价依据。The paper established an evaluation index system of HEI scientific research team performance, and put forward evaluation model based on analytical hierarchy process （AHP） and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution （TOPSIS） by similarity to an ideal solution （TOPSIS） . Using AHP, the evaluation index was made. The positive ideal solution, negative ideal solution and proximity were calculated. The rank of HEI scientific and technology research team performance evaluation was made by comparing the proximity. An example was analysis to validate the practicability and feasibility of the established index system and model. The results proved the evaluation index system could give a new kind of methods for HEI scientific research team performance evaluation.

关 键 词：高校科研团队 绩效评价 AHP TOPSIS 指标体系 

分 类 号：G644[文化科学—高等教育学]