检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭国良[1] 姚微源[1] 莫建松 王海强[1,2] 吴忠标[1,2]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学环境工程研究所,浙江杭州310027 [2]浙江省工业锅炉炉窑烟气污染控制工程技术研究中心,浙江杭州310027
出 处:《工业水处理》2012年第5期24-27,共4页Industrial Water Treatment
基 金:863国家高技术研究发展计划(2009AA064002);教育部长江学者奖励计划(2009)
摘 要:分别研究了空气催化氧化法、双氧水氧化法和漂白粉氧化法对脱硫用电石渣浆液中硫化物的去除效果。实验结果表明,在适当条件下,空气氧化法可在240 min内使硫化物的去除率达到80%,适量的双氧水和漂白粉能够使硫化物降至0.5 mg/L以下,去除率达到99%以上。在此基础上对比了3种工艺的经济成本:空气催化氧化法<漂白粉氧化法<双氧水氧化法。The removal effect of sulfide from carbide slag slurry for desulfurization by three processes,including catalytic air oxidation, H2O2 oxidation and chlorinated lime oxidation, has been studied. The results show that under appropriate conditions the removing rate of sulfide reaches 80% within 240 min by air oxidation process. The sulfide removing rate can be higher than 99%, by using appropriate amount of H2O2 and chlorinated lime. Based on these studies, the economic costs of the three processes are contrasted. It is found that the economic cost of catalytic air oxidant process is less than that of chlorinated lime oxidation process and the cost of chlorinated lime oxidation process is less than that of H2O2 oxidation process.
分 类 号:X703.1[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222