检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东中医药大学,山东济南250355 [2]山东中医药大学附属医院,山东济南250011
出 处:《中国医药导报》2012年第15期137-138,共2页China Medical Herald
基 金:山东省中医药科学技术研究项目(2009Z004-2)
摘 要:目的对比观察不同进针深度对于治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效,为临床制订优选方案提供依据。方法选取42例膝关节骨性关节炎患者,将其随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组21例采用深刺治疗,对照组21例采用常规针刺深度治疗,对两组的疗效进行比较。结果治疗组总有效率为90.48%,对照组总有效率为80.95%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针刺深刺治疗膝骨关节炎,临床操作方便,疗效确切,安全性好,与常规进针深度相比,疗效更加显著。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy on the acupuncture of different depth of needle insertion in the treatment of osteoarthritis in the knees, and to provide the clinical basis for treatment. Methods 42 patients were randomly divided in two groups. There were 21 cases received deep needling acupuncture in the treatment group; there were 21 cas- es received routines acupuncture in the control group. The effects of two groups were observed. Results The total effective rate was 90% in the treatment group and 80% in the control group. There was a difference in clinical efficacy between the two groups (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Deep needling acupuncture is a safe simple efficacy method to treat osteoarthritis in the knee than routines acupuncture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222