20世纪30年代对“商资归农”活动的三种批判意见——骆耕漠、韦东、李龙门主张之比较  

Three Kinds of Criticial Advice on the Activity of "Commercial Capital Returned to Countrysides" in 1930s

作　　者：许永峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大同大学文史学院,山西大同037009

出　　处：《山西大同大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第2期28-31,共4页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：山西大同大学博士科研启动经费资助项目(2011-B-14)

摘　　要：20世纪30年代",商资归农"活动遭到了一些社会人士的尖锐批评,骆耕漠、韦东、李龙门为其中的三个代表人物。他们的批判反映了这场活动中客观存在的一些问题,但各自的理论依据又不尽相同,一定程度上折射出国人对当时中国农村出路问题的思考。In 1930s, the activity of ＂commercial capital returned to countrysides＂ was criticized sharply by some people in the society. LUO Geng-mo, WEI Dong and LI Long-men were representatives. Their comments reflected some objective questions of the activity, but their own theoretical bases were not consistent entirely, from which reflected that countrymen＇s thoughts on Chinese countrysides＇ fortune then to a certain extent.

关 键 词：“商资归农” 批判 骆耕漠 韦东 李龙门 

分 类 号：K264.39[历史地理—历史学]