检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]工业和信息化部软件与集成电路促进中心,北京100038
出 处:《中国集成电路》2011年第8期82-87,共6页China lntegrated Circuit
摘 要:本文详细介绍了OLED公司之间的授权、交叉许可和诉讼行为,为我国相关企业在国际化进程中突破知识产权门槛提供参考。OLED授权专利组合主要由柯达公司(小分子)、英国剑桥显示技术公司CDT(高分子)、美国环宇显示公司UDC(磷光等)等持有。友达光电和三星电子,飞利浦和欧司朗,出光兴产与LG Display、索尼、TDK都签署了关于OLED技术的专利交叉许可协议。OLED领域也出现了专利诉讼,随着OLED产业化的成熟,各国公司之间为争夺市场,OLED专利纠纷将继续增多。我国企业要加入OLED产业化战局,在注重专利布局、获取与国外巨头进行专利交叉许可筹码的同时,也要积极争取某些"绕不开"的基础专利的授权,降低被诉风险。This paper introduced in detail the authorization, cross-licensing and litigation situation among OLED corporations, and provided reference for Chinese related corporations to break intellectual property barriers during the international process. The major OLED patent portfolios are held by Kodak (small molecules), Cambridge Display Technology CDT (polymer), Universal Display Corporation UDC (phosphorescence, etc.) and so on. AU Optronics vs Samsung Electronics, Philips vs Osram, Idemitsu Kosan vs LG Display, Idemitsu Kosan vs Sony, Idemitsu Kosan vs TDK have signed patent cross-licensing agreement on OLED technology. There also appeared patent litigation in the field of OLED. As the OLED industry matures, OLED patent disputes will continue to increase. If Chinese corporations are willing to join in the OLED "war", they not only need to pay attention to the patent layout as counters to proceed patent cross-license action with foreign magnate, but also actively to strive for certain basic patent license which can not be bypassed to reduce the risk of being sued.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15