Grice意义理论中的意向与规约  

Intention and Convention in the Gricean Meaning Theory

作　　者：姚晓东[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学外语学院,北京100083

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2012年第3期33-36,共4页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基　　金：北京林业大学青年科技启动基金项目"Grice合作思想深层次挖掘"(项目编号:2010BLX21);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"二语句法形态发展研究"(项目编号:RW2011-25)资助

摘　　要：Grice的意义分析模式被认为过于强调说话人意向的主导地位,而无视语言规约。本文旨在揭示这一论断的片面和不实之处。研究发现,Grice对意向概念有严格的界定,而非一个随意的常识性概念;他的意义理论并未抛弃规约,并且他对其中的说话人意向与语言规约之间比配关系的看法,也并非一成不变。It is held that Grice＇s meaning analysis,by placing undue stress on the dominating role of the speaker＇s intention,has ignored the linguistic convention.This article examines the concepts underlying Grice＇s meaning theory and concludes that the criticism above is too sweeping and even groundless in a sense.The Gricean concept of ＇intention＇ is strictly defined,and it is not a loose or common sense notion.Grice himself,in his meaning theory,does not shake off the convention,and his view of the ratio between the speaker＇s intention and linguistic convention is not static.

关 键 词：说话人意向 语言规约 意向意义 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]