行政犯罪中刑事责任与行政责任聚合之处断规则  

Processing Rules of Coincidence of Criminal and Administrative Responsibility in Administrative Crime

作　　者：张旭[1] 顾阳[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《辽宁大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第3期107-111,共5页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目"法律责任体系梳理与重构"的阶段性成果(2009JJD820004)

摘　　要：在行政犯罪中,因行为人的同一违法行为具有刑事与行政的双重违法性,并且又具备了刑事责任与行政责任不同性质法律责任的构成要件,发生同一违法行为的责任聚合问题。具体而言,发生刑事责任与行政责任聚合的原因有很多,主要集中在行为主体、行为性质、行为后果,以及责任的独立性与非排他性上。在我国的立法与司法中,刑事责任与行政责任聚合的规定与实践均有所体现,但是对于聚合后,责任之间关系如何,以及责任竞合如何选择等,都没有给予充分合理的回应。基于此,本文通过探析刑事责任与行政责任聚合后的共存处断规则,旨在建立相互包容、相互协调、互补互助的行政犯罪法律责任体系(系统)。According to Administrative Criminal Law theory,the administrative crimes always have double illegalities which include both administrative illegality and criminal law violation.First,the administrative crimes violate administrative laws and regulations;furthermore,the behaviors do great harm to society and personal safety,thus they violate the criminal law and have the nature of criminal transgression.So Responsibility coincidence of the same offense has occurred.Specifically,there are many reasons for responsibility coincidence.In China,responsibility coincidence exists in the judicial practice and legal requirements.However,after coincidence,how to clarify the responsibility,is still a question.Based on this,this paper analyzes the rules and principles in settling criminal and administrative responsibility,aiming at creating an administrative criminal law liability system（System）of mutual tolerance,coordination,and benefit.

关 键 词：责任 聚合 处断规则 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]