检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建省仙游县医院,仙游351200
出 处:《护理学杂志(综合版)》2000年第3期135-136,共2页Journal of Nursing Science
摘 要:采用甲醛氧化浓氨熏蒸法与甲醛氧化熏蒸法对 3种细菌的灭活效果进行对比观察。结果 :常规用量时 ,两种方法对细菌的灭活率分别为 76 .7%和 73.3% ;大剂量 (高浓度 )时 ,两种方法对细菌的灭活率均为 10 0 %。经统计学处理 ,P>0 .0 5 ,二者差异无显著性。提示两种方法对 3种细菌的灭活效果是一致的。采用甲醛氧化浓氨熏蒸法既可避免甲醛毒性对医护人员身体的危害 ,又不影响其灭菌效果 ,有效消毒时限为 46 h,值得推广应用。The sterilized effects of oxidized strong ammonia fumigation and oxidized fumigation to three kinds of bacteria were comparatively observed. In the routine dosage, the sterilized rate of the above methods was 76 7 % and 73 3 % respectively. In high doses, the sterilized rate of both methods was 100 %. No significant difference was found between the two methods ( P >0 05). It was suggested that the sterilization of the two methods for 3 kinds of bacteria was identical. The oxidized strong ammonia fumigation could not only avoid the damage of formalin toxicity to medical staff, but also had influence on its sterilization with the effective sterilization time being 46 h.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117