检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]聊城大学生命科学学院,山东聊城252059 [2]聊城大学农学院,山东聊城252059
出 处:《浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)》2012年第3期250-255,共6页Journal of Zhejiang University:Agriculture and Life Sciences
基 金:山东省自然科学基金资助项目(Y2008D41)
摘 要:以绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)基因为报告基因,分别用改良农杆菌介导的花序浸渍法(floral-dip)和花粉管通道法转化紫薇(Lagerstroemia indica),统计果实数、结实率、成苗率,然后用紫外灯照射28d左右的幼苗筛选转化株。结果表明:花粉管通道法转化紫薇的结实率、成苗率均明显高于floral-dip法;用手携式紫外灯(365nm)照射进行活体鉴定,floral-dip法转化率比花粉管通道转基因法转化率高0.06%,但未达到显著水平;而花粉管通道法的结实率比floral-dip法的高11.87%~26.74%,更利于获得转化植株。说明通过花粉管通道法进行转化更适合于紫薇转基因新品种的培育。Lagerstroemia indica was transformed by an improved Agrobacterium-mediated floral-dip and pollen-tube pathway method, respectively, using green fluorescent protein gene (GFP) as a report gene, and its fruit number, rate of seed-setting set and seedling rate were counted. The transformed plants were screened from the 28-day seedlings irradiated by a portable ultraviolet lamp at 365 nm. The experimental results showed that the rate of seed-setting set and seedling rate by pollen-tube pathway method were significantly higher than those by the floral-dip method. The transformation rate of L. indica by' the floral-dip method was higher by 0.06% than that by the pollen-tube pathway, which didn't yet reach significant levels. The rate of seed-setting set by the pollen-tube pathway method was higher by 11.87%-26.74% than that by the floral-dip method, indicating that the pollen-tube pathway method is more beneficial for transformation of L. indica.
关 键 词:紫薇 改良农杆菌介导的floral—dip法 花粉管通道法 转化
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117