检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周伟[1]
出 处:《河南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第3期93-96,共4页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)
摘 要:从刑事政策的视角看,醉驾入刑是立法机关所作出的一项正确选择。作为一种具有严重社会危害性及应受刑罚处罚性的行为,醉驾具有入刑的必要性。此外,面对日益严重的醉驾现状,原有的处罚已不足以抑止此类违法行为以充分保护公共交通安全,故将其入刑亦符合刑法谦抑原则的要求。然而,具有入刑的正当性,并不代表立法规定本身及实施过程中的完美性,入刑后存在的问题同样值得关注。Though drunk driving has been written into the criminal law, the controversy over its legitimacy never ends. Seen from the perspective of the criminal policy, drunk dinking being written into the criminal law seems to be a right choice by the legislature. Drunk driving is seriously harmful for the society and drunk drivers should receive penal punishment, therefore it is necessary to write drunk drinking into the criminal law. In addition, as the problem of drunk drinking continues worsening, the original punishment has become insufficient to restrain violators. In order to better protect the safety of the public transport, it is also a requirement of the modesty principle of criminal law to write drunk driving into criminal law. The legitimacy, however, does not guarantee the perfection of legislation and implementation. The problem after the legislation also requires our attention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117