尊重历史 实事求是 端正学风——学术个案《公莫舞》研究之研究  

Respect History,Base on Facts,Correct Style of Study——Academic Case Study on the Research of Male Mo Dance

作　　者：叶桂桐 

机构地区：[1]山东外事翻译职业学院基础部,山东乳山264504

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第3期1-11,共11页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：论文对以《公莫舞》为代表的汉魏六朝"声辞杂写"乐府古辞研究的历史和现状作了全面的介绍,在《汉〈巾舞歌诗〉试解》、《论〈公莫舞〉非歌舞剧演出脚本》的基础上,对杨公骥先生认为《公莫舞》是歌舞剧演出脚本的结论进行了进一步论证,认为杨先生的结论不能成立,《公莫舞》不是歌舞剧演出脚本,杨公骥先生并没有将中国戏剧史提前一千多年。我们对逯钦立、孙楷第、杨公骥三先生的研究做了比较,说明了杨公骥先生失误的主要原因,最后指出,学术界对杨公骥先生考证结论的盲从和过誉是目前学风不正的表现。This paper introduces the history and present situation on research of the collecting of folk songs and archaism--sound of miscellaneous writing ,as a representative of six dynasties of Hart and Wei. On the basis of Explanation on Song of Towel Dance of Han, on Male Mo Dance---non---opera script.the paper further argues the conclusion that male mo dance is an opera script. The author thinks that Mr yang＇ s theory can not be established and Male Mo Dance is not a script. Mr Yang does not push the history of Chinese opera for more than one thousand years ahead. The paper compares the researches of Mr Lu Qinli, Sun Kaidi, and Yang Gongji and clarifies the major cause of Mr Yang＇ s fault.

关 键 词：学术个案 公莫舞 杨公骥 学风 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]