食品监管渎职罪的认定  

Determination of Crime of Malfeasance in Food Regulation

作　　者：温建辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]聊城大学法学院,山东聊城252059

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第3期74-78,共5页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(J11WB52):罪过理论转型研究;山东省教育科学规划课题(2011GG056):审美素质在法学教育中作用研究

摘　　要：食品监管渎职罪只能是疏忽大意的过失犯罪。在食品监管渎职罪中,行为人对违反食品监管法规持故意的过错心理,行为人对重大食品安全事故或者其他严重后果的发生没有认识或者行为人认为这种危害结果不会发生,其对重大食品安全事故或者其他严重后果的发生持漠不关心的情感态度。在司法实践中,应注意食品监管渎职行为因法规竞合所生诸罪名的认定,也要注意区分食品监管渎职罪与危害食品安全犯罪的界限。The crime of malfeasance in food regulation can only be neglectful misstep. The criminal＇s psychological attitude to break to food law exclusively is deliberate in malfeasance in food regulation. The criminal＇s attitude to havoc about food safety accidents has not recognized or the one don＇t think that havoc would happen. The actor holds the indifference feelings attitude to the havoc. Should pay attention to the food regulatory malfeasance in judicial practice, we should pay attention to distinguish the boundaries of the food regulatory malfeasance crime and to identify the crime of endangering food safety from the crime of malfeasance in food regulation.

关 键 词：食品监管渎职罪 疏忽大意过失犯罪 危害食品安全犯罪 

分 类 号：DF637[政治法律—刑法学]