检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南理工大学环境科学与工程学院,广东广州510006
出 处:《生态与农村环境学报》2012年第3期300-304,共5页Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment
基 金:广东省自然科学基金团队项目(9351064101000001);广东省自然科学基金(10151064101000041)
摘 要:通过室外盆栽试验,比较了玉米(Zea mays)和黄豆(Glycine max)2种植物对酸性土壤中石油污染物的去除效果。结果表明,2种植物对土壤中石油具有良好的耐受性和去除效果。玉米和黄豆对石油烃的去除率分别可达38.41%~64.30%和34.24%~63.96%,而自然条件下石油去除率仅为23.77%~58.43%。聚合酶链式反应-变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)图谱分析结果显示,当w(石油)为0~17 295 mg.kg-1时,土壤微生物群落的丰度和多样性大致随着w(石油)的升高而呈下降趋势,植物根系能够选择性地促进根际微生物的增殖,且玉米根系的作用比黄豆明显。An outdoor pot experiment was conducted to compare maize ( Zea mays) with soybean ( Glycine max) in effect of removing petroleum pollutants from acid soil. Results show that both of the two plants are good at tolerating and remo- ving petroleum pollutants in the soil. In labe, maize and soybean could remove 38.41% - 64. 30% and 34. 24% - 63.96%, respectively of the petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil, while in the field only 23.77% - 58.43%. The PCR- DGGE pattern showed that abundance and diversity of the microbial community in the polluted soil decreased with the in- crease in concentration of the pollutants from 0 to 17 295 mg·kg-1. The root systems of the two plants are able to selec- tively promote proliferation of some species of microbe in the rhizosphere and the effect is more significant with maize than with soybean.
关 键 词:石油污染 植物修复 酸性土壤 PCR-DGGE 根际微生物
分 类 号:X53[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112