检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱文珲[1] 廖瑞端[1] 陈咏冲[1] 李易娟[2] 陈慧卿[2]
机构地区:[1]广州市中山大学附属第一医院眼科,广东广州510080 [2]广州市中山大学附属第一医院儿科,广东广州510080
出 处:《中国儿童保健杂志》2012年第6期535-537,共3页Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
摘 要:【目的】探讨眼底检查对高危儿颅内出血(intracranial hemorrhage,ICH)的预测价值。【方法】回顾性分析本院在矫正胎龄45周内已行头颅CT/MRI及眼底检查的423例高危儿病例。【结果】颅内出血122例、眼底出血202例,眼底出血高危儿202例中头颅CT/MRI证实有颅内出血109人(53.96%),无眼底出血高危儿中颅内出血13人(3.0%),经比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。有颅内出血高危儿的眼底出血程度与无颅内出血高危儿的眼底出血程度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。颅内出血与眼底出血两者之间密切相关(R=62.02,P=0.000)。【结论】高危儿行眼底检查有助于预测其颅内出血的发生。[Objective] To investigate the value of fundus examination in evaluating intracranial hemorrhage(ICH) in high risk infants. [Method] 423 cases of high-risk infants,taken head CT/MRI and fundus examination before 45 weeks corrected gestational age in our hospital,were retrospective analyzed. [Results] 122 cases of intracranial hemorrhage,Z02 cases of retinal hemorrhage, 109 cases(53. 96~) of ICH among the cases with retinal hemorrhage (RH) and 13 cases (3.0~~) of ICH among the cases without RH were compared. The difference of ICH incidence had statistical significance(P %0.01). The difference of the degree of RH with and without ICH in high risk infants had statistical significance(P% 0.01). ICH and RH were closely related(R 62.02,P= 0. 000). [Conclusion] Fundus examination could be predictive of ICH in high risk infants.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117