检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许文龙[1] 张国祥[1] 王红旗[1] 全建军[1] 雷和月 叶君[1]
出 处:《中国卫生检验杂志》2012年第5期1031-1033,1036,共4页Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
基 金:杭州市萧山区科技局课题(2010702)
摘 要:目的:探讨乙型肝炎表面抗原定量检测阳性标本进行确认实验的研究。方法:收集化学发光微粒子免疫分析法(CMIA)检测HBsAg阳性标本1974例,应用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)等方法复检,对ELISA法末检出的标本进行CMIA法中和确证实验。结果:1974例标本使用ELISA法检测HBsAg有漏检现象的发生,漏检率为9.1%。漏检标本经CMIA法中和确证实验阳性率为96.67%,有6例无法确认。结论:定性方法在HBsAg检测上与发光等定量方法相比存在明显不足。对低浓度HBsAg阳性者应通过中和试验等予以确认。Objective:To investigate the study of confirmatory test for hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)-positive samples detected by quantitative experiment.Methods: 1974 positive samples tested by chemiluminescent micropaticle immunoassay(CMIA) were collected and the HBsAg were detected by enzyme-linked immunoasorbent assay(ELISA) and HBsAg ELISA negative samples were confirmed by CMIA neutralization test.Results: 1974 samples had undetected situation by ELISA methods.The missed detection rate was 9.1%.Undetected samples by ELISA were confirmed by CMIA neutralization test and the positive rate was 96.67%.6 cases could not be confirmed.Conclusion: Compared with quantitative methods such as chemiluminescence,the qualitative methods were obviously insufficient.The confirmatory tests were done for the low-concentration HBsAg-positive patients.
关 键 词:乙型表面抗原 微粒子化学发光免疫分析技术 抗体中和确认实验
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229