检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:成晔[1] 何文[1] 张红霞[1] 隗冬梅[1] 程令刚[1] 李慧展[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院超声科,北京100050
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2012年第6期1060-1063,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
摘 要:目的探讨植入式微波水冷电极不同时间、功率组合消融犬活体肺组织的范围和特点。方法应用植入式微波水冷电极对20只健康成年杂种犬采用不同时间、功率组合进行消融:1组(40W×120s,n=1),2组(40W×180s,n=1),3组(40W×240s,n=1),4组(40W×300s,n=2),5组(50W×120s,n=1),6组(50W×180s,n=2),7组(50W×240s,n=2),8组(50W×300s,n=2),9组(60W×120s,n=2),10组(60W×180s,n=2),11组(60W×240s,n=2),12组(60W×300s,n=2)。术中分别于消融针旁开1cm及周边充血带处测温,术后取肺组织肉眼观察消融灶形态、特点,测量并比较各组消融灶长、宽径,消融灶组织送病理检查。结果消融4组中1只犬因麻醉意外于术前死亡;19只犬完成实验,共247个消融灶,肉眼观呈椭球形,自中心至外周分别为中心碳化区、凝固区及周边充血带。11组[长径(3.38±0.39)cm、宽径(1.70±0.23)cm]与12组[长径(3.33±0.27)cm、宽径(1.63±0.35)cm]消融灶最大,且大于非水冷式微波电极在相同功率更短时间内(60W×600s)获得的消融灶[长径(1.54±0.19)cm、宽径(1.13±0.14)cm],差异有统计学意义(P=0.016)。12组针道周边肉眼可见炭化区。各组消融针旁开1cm处温度均达70℃以上,周围充血带温度均在50~60℃,带宽0.6~1.0cm。结论植入式微波水冷电极消融犬活体肺组织的最佳组合条件为60W×240s,其消融范围大,无中心炭化区,较非水冷式微波电极消融具有更大优势。Objective To investigate the area and advantages of water-cooled microwave ablation with different power and time.Methods Water-cooled microwave ablation was performed on 20 canines with different power and time: Group 1(40 W×120 s,n=1),group 2(40 W×180 s,n=1),group 3(40 W×240 s,n=1),group 4(40 W×300 s,n=2),group 5(50 W×120 s,n=1),group 6(50 W×180 s,n=2),group 7(50 W×240 s,n=2),group 8(50 W×300 s,n=2),group 9(60 W×120 s,n=2),group 10(60 W×180 s,n=2),group 11(60W×240 s,n=2),group 12(60 W×300 s,n=2).Temperatures were measured in both 1 cm to the electrode and the red zone in the operation.The shape and features of ablation foci were observed,and the size was measured and compared.Pathological examination was made as well.Results One canine died before ablation because of anesthesia,and 19 canines completed experiment.Totally there were 247 ablation foci with ellipsoid shape.Carbonization area,coagulation area and congestion area were seen from the center to the border of the ablation foci.Thediameter and width of ablation foci in group 11([3.38±0.39]cm,[1.70±0.23]cm) and group 12([3.33±0.27]cm,[1.63±0.35]cm) were the largest,which were larger than 60 W×600 s(diameter [1.54±0.19)cm,width [1.13±0.14]cm) induced with non-water-cooled microwave ablation(P=0.016).Carbonization could be seen around the electrode in group 12.The temperatures measured in point 1 cm to the electrode were 50—60℃,and the range of peripheral reactive band was 0.6—1.0 cm in every group.Conclusion Combination of 60 W×240 s in water-cooled microwave ablation can get large ablation area,and no carbonization in the center,therefore having more advantages than non-water-cooled microwave ablation.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R-332[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222