检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈越峰[1] 丛淑珍[1] 刘娟娟[1] 甘科红[1] 王满立[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省医学科学院广东省人民医院超声科,广州市510080
出 处:《中国超声医学杂志》2012年第6期557-559,共3页Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
基 金:广东省科技计划项目(粤科函社No.20101096号)
摘 要:目的探讨超声弹性成像在甲状腺微小癌诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析经病理证实的32例甲状腺微小癌患者的常规超声及弹性成像声像特征,比较2种方法对甲状腺微小癌的诊断准确率。结果32例甲状腺微小癌中,常规超声诊断25例.诊断准确率为78.13%。超声弹性成像诊断30例,诊断准确率为93.75%。弹性成像诊断准确率高于常规超声(X^2=16.32,P<0.05)。结论超声弹性成像在甲状腺微小癌诊断上较常规超声更有价值。Objective To evaluate the application of ultrasonic elastography in diagnosis of thyroid microcarci- noma. Methods The images of uhrasoound and ultrasonic elastography of thirty two cases of thyroid microcarcinoma confirmed by surgery and pathology were analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic performance of the 2 methods was evaluated. Results 25 cases were found by ultrasoound and 30 cases were observed by ultrasonic elastography. The di- agnosis accurate rate of ultrasoound and ultrasonic elastography was about 78.13% and 93.75%. The accuracy of UE was higher than that ultrasound in diagnosing thyroid microcarcinoma (X^2 = 16.32, P〈0.05). Conclusions UE has better diagnostic value than ultrasoound in the diagnosis of thyroid microearcinoma.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R736.1[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46