检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中兽医医药杂志》2012年第3期41-42,共2页Journal of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine
基 金:长江大学全国大学生创新性实验基金项目(091048926)资助
摘 要:选取断奶家兔32只,随机分成4组,各组饲料分别添加中药0 g/kg(Ⅰ,对照)、6 g/kg(Ⅱ)、9 g/kg(Ⅲ)和12g/kg(Ⅳ)。试验期60 d,测定各组初始体重、期末体重以及饲料消耗量,评价中草药饲料添加剂对家兔增重和料肉比的影响,并对各组经济效益进行比较。结果显示,试验Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ组平均日增重分别比对照组提高13.67%、18.28%、20.92%,且差异显著(P<0.05);试验Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ组料肉比分别为3.59∶1、3.51∶1和3.46∶1,分别比对照组降低6.02%、8.11%和9.42%,且差异显著(P<0.05);试验组Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ经济效益分别比对照组提高19.8%、25.8%和29.1%(P<0.05)。32 weaned rabbits were devided randomly into 4 groups which were Ⅰ . Ⅱ , Ⅲ and Ⅳ. Then Chinese herbal medicine additive were added to their feed at 0 g/kg( 1 .as control ), 6 g/kg( Ⅱ ), 9 g/kg ( Ⅲ )and 12g/kg ( Ⅳ ). respectively. The initial weight, terminal weight, feed consumption and economic benefit of each group was measured to gauge the influence of Chinese herbal medicine feed additive on the growth performance of rabbits. The results showed that compared with Ⅰ , the average daily gains of Ⅱ , Ⅲ and Ⅳ was significantly increased by 13.67%. 18.28% and 20.92%(P〈0.05), the feed conversion ratios was significantly deereased by 6.02%. 8.11% and 9.42% (P〈0.05), and the economic benefits was significantly increased by 19.8%, 25.8% and 29.1%, respectively.
分 类 号:S853.74[农业科学—临床兽医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15