检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张琪[1]
出 处:《科技管理研究》2012年第11期175-179,共5页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:浙江省自然科学基金项目"基于技术监测分析的科技规划制定方法研究--以电动汽车技术领域为例"(Q12G030101)
摘 要:随着专利数量的逐年大幅增长,获取有效目标专利的难度也越来越大,专利检索如何实现检准率和检全率的合理平衡成为研究难点。以德温特专利数据库中3G技术专利为检索对象,比较了传统主题检索和手工代码检索两种方式所对应检索及其分析结果的异同,研究表明选择合理的专利检索和分析方法有助于保证分析结果的权威性。With the yearly increase in the amount of patent data, it is more and more difficult to get target patent effec- tively, because how to keep the balance between the rate of accuracy and the rate of founding actual patents is always the most challenging part for research. Based on patent data of 3G in DII ( Derwent Innovations Index) database, results and differences of traditional theme search and manual code search have been compared. The data analyses close to the actual extent of the situation in two different statistical methods with the same patent data have been done, and the results show that the retrieval and analysis methods used in this paper get more reliable conclusions, which have some practical significance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249