艾粒温针灸结合物理因子治疗臂丛神经损伤病理性疼痛的临床观察  

Ai grain temperature acupuncture combined with clinical observation of the physical factor in the treatment of neuropathic pain,brachial plexus injury

作　　者：段丽娟[1] 周俊明[2] 沈雪勇[3] 张沈煜[2] 

机构地区：[1]上海中医药大学针推学院硕士研究生,上海200032 [2]复旦大学附属华山医院,上海200040 [3]上海中医药大学针灸推拿学院,上海200032

出　　处：《按摩与康复医学》2012年第17期13-14,共2页Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine

摘　　要：目的：观察艾粒型温针灸结合物理因子治疗臂丛神经损伤所致病理性疼痛的临床疗效.方法：将17例臂丛神经损伤后疼痛患者随机分为普通温针灸治疗组7例、艾粒温针灸治疗组10例,采用简化McGill疼痛询问量表评定两组疼痛情况,进行疗效对比.结果：17例病人全部完成整个疗程,脱失0例.完成全部治疗后,两组组各项评分有显著性差异（P〈0.01）.艾粒温针灸组治疗前后比较,PRI选词数无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,PRI情绪项差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,其余各评分有显著性差异（P〈0.01）.结论：艾粒型温针灸治疗臂丛神经损伤后病理性疼痛优于普通温针灸,实施方便.Objective：The therapeutic effect of warming needle combining with physical rehabilitation factors in treating the neuropathic pain caused by brachial plexus injury. Methods：Divide 17 cases with 7 cases of neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury into normal warming needle treatment group,and 10 cases of moxa stick warming needle. The short--form of McGill Pain Questionnaire was used in this study to compare the effects. Result：17 cases finished the whole course,no case losses. All scores had significant statistical differences （P〈0.01） among two groups after treatment. In moxa stick warming needle group,PRI numbers had no statistical differences,PRI emotional degree of the treatment group before and after treatment had statistical differences （P〈0. 05） ,while the others had significant differences （P〈0.01）. Conelusion：Moxa stick warming needle was more effective for treating neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury and more convenient to master than normal warming needle.

关 键 词：臂丛神经损伤 病理性疼痛 温针灸 康复 

分 类 号：R4[医药卫生—临床医学]