检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学城市公共安全研究中心,天津300071
出 处:《中国安全科学学报》2012年第4期144-150,共7页China Safety Science Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点项目资助(70833003)
摘 要:为实现对油气管道风险的有效控制,结合油气管道的特点,基于成本收益分析方法改进风险控制决策过程。首先,确定风险控制目标,对所建议的措施进行初步筛选,并根据行业现状确定基线场景;之后,量化筛选后的措施的成本与收益,通过计算成本收益率(CBR)或规避事故隐含成本(ICAF)来确定相应措施的合理性;最后,依据上述分析制定风险控制决策。结果表明:不同措施的CBR或ICAF值不同,CBR或ICAF值较低的措施应被优先实施;而当CBR或ICAF值超过标准值时,相应措施是不合理的,应不予以实施。In order to control the risk from oil and gas pipelines effectively,decision-making process of risk control was improved,based on cost-benefit analysis.First,targets of risk control were set,initial screening of proposed risk control options(RCOs) was carried out,and baseline scenarios were identified;Second,costs and benefits arising from RCOs were quantified,and by calculating Cost-Benefit Ratio(CBR) or ICAF,whether RCOs were reasonably practicable can be proved;Finally,risk control decisions were made according to analysis above.The results show that CBR or ICAF vary with different RCOs;RCOs with lower CBR or ICAF should be carried out preferentially;RCOs with CBR or ICAF exceeding the criteria are reasonabl and should not be put into practice.
关 键 词:成本收益分析 油气管道 风险控制 风险决策 事故隐含成本(ICAF) 合理可接受
分 类 号:X921[环境科学与工程—安全科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.153.154