我国产品责任制度:守成与创新  

Product Liability System in China:Achievements Maintenance and Innovation

作　　者：张新宝[1] 任鸿雁[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2012年第3期5-19,共15页Northern Legal Science

摘　　要：相对于《产品质量法》有关产品责任的规定,《侵权责任法》第五章既有守成的一面也有诸多创新规定,在解释上不可完全适用特别法优先的原则或新法优先的原则,而是要将两个法律的相关规定有机结合起来进行系统的解释,方能正确适用。《侵权责任法》没有对产品责任中的"损害"进行重新界定,产品自身的财产损失不属于产品责任的"损害";精神损害赔偿适用于产品责任案件,惩罚性赔偿规定的适用有待最高人民法院作出更具有可操作性的司法解释。Compared with regulations on product liability in the Product Quality Law, there are both maintained achievements and innovations in Chapter Five of Tort Law. Accordingly, as to interpretation and application of law, these two laws should be integrated for systemic interpretation and such principle as special law or new law prevails is not suggested to be strictly applied to. In Tort Law, since ＂damages＂ are not redefined in product liability, monetary loss of product itself cannot be defined as ＂damages＂. Damages for mental distress can be applied to product liability cases. Further, applicable regulations on punitive damages require more instructive judicial interpretations by the Supreme Peonle＇ s Court.

关 键 词：产品责任 精神损害 惩罚性赔偿 

分 类 号：DF51[政治法律—民商法学]