检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学
出 处:《北方法学》2012年第3期85-91,共7页Northern Legal Science
摘 要:随着区域贸易安排浪潮的兴起,协调WTO与区域贸易安排之间的关系成为国际法学界关注的焦点之一。WTO有关区域贸易安排的规定用语模糊,各成员国对规定的理解存在较大分歧,专家组、上诉机构对此采取回避的态度。从"软法"的角度来看,这些规定"硬度"较小,属于软法的范畴。这种"软法"的特性在诸多方面契合了实用主义法学的特征,故而,WTO在处理其与区域贸易安排的关系方面宜采取实用主义法学的进路。As the development of the regional trade arrangements ( RTAs), scholars of international law have paid their attention to the coordination of the relationship between WTO and RTAs. Since the WTO' s provisions on RTAs are ambiguous, many understanding divergences arise among Members, but the Panel and AB choose to avoid solving the problems in their rulings. From the perspective of "soft law", these provisions bear few characters of "hard law" but correspond to legal pragmatism. Therefore, WTO is suggested to cope with the relationship between WTO and RTAs in the way of legal pragmatism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7