从“唐人选唐诗”看文学史著作选评唐诗的得失  

Gains and Losses in Literary History Books in the Perspective of Tang Poetry Anthologies Selected in Tang Dynasty

作　　者：孙桂平[1] 

机构地区：[1]集美大学文学院,福建厦门362021

出　　处：《华南理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第3期86-91,共6页Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要："唐人选唐诗"有助于我们认识文学史论著选评唐诗的得失。"唐人选唐诗"与文学史著作选评李杜诗异同情况:两者都重视李白乐府与歌行;后者重视李白绝句,前者不重视;《才调集》突出了李诗题材"近俗"的特征,文学史著作则忽略了。两者都推重杜律;诗史类作品不被前者所重视,为后者所重视。皇甫冉《巫山高》和祖咏《苏氏别业》为"唐人选唐诗"重视,不为文学史论著关注。王维山水田园诗应该进入文学史,但编撰者有偏爱之嫌;王翰的《凉州词》进入文学史著作的方式以及是否应该进入文学史著作,都需要讨论。Tang Poetry Anthologies Selected in Tang Dynasty is useful for us to understand the gains and losses in literary history books. They both values verse poems and Ge Xing of Li-Bai. The former values quatrains of Li-Bai while the latter do not. The feature closing to the secular of Li is ignored in literary history books. They both val- ues metrical poetries of Du-Fu, while historical poetries were ignored in Tang Poetry Anthologies Selected in Tang Dynasty. Tang Poetry Anthologies Selected in Tang Dynasty values Wu-Shan Gao and Su Shi Bie Ye while literary history books do not. Landscape poetries of Wang-Wei should enter into literary history books, but they were over- estimated. How Lliang Zhou Ci by Wang-Han entered into literary history books and whether it should are questions being asked.

关 键 词：“唐人选唐诗” 文学史著作 李杜诗 《巫山高》 《苏氏别业》 王维山水田园诗 《凉州词》 

分 类 号：I222[文学—中国文学]