大学生宿舍冲突管理方式量表的信效度检验  

Study on Reliability and Validity of the Scale of College Students' Conflict Management Styles in Dormitory Setting

作　　者：光裕[1] 曾细花[1] 陈文星[1] 胡菡[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国.南方医科大学心理系,广州510515

出　　处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2012年第6期949-951,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology

基　　金：广东省大学生创新实验计划项目(1212110022)

摘　　要：目的将冲突方式量表改编为《大学生宿舍冲突管理方式量表》,并检验其信效度。方法使用改编的《大学生宿舍冲突管理方式量表》对579名大学生进行测试,运用结构方程模型对量表进行验证性因素分析,以自我构念量表为效标检验量表的效标效度,同时对量表的信度进行检验。结果①《大学生宿舍冲突管理方式量表》共有78个条目和11个因素,验证性因素分析表明量表的结构效度良好(χ2/df=3.23,P<0.05,NFI=0.95,NNFI=0.96,IFI=0.96,CFI=0.96,RMSEA=0.07),量表与自我构念量表之间存在预期相关;②《大学生宿舍冲突管理方式量表》的Cronbachα系数为0.97,各分量表的α系数在0.76～0.92之间。结论《大学生宿舍冲突管理方式量表》具有良好的信效度,可应用于大学生宿舍冲突的研究。Objective To revise the Conflict Styles Questionnaire as the Scale of College Students’ Conflict Management Styles in Dormitory Setting（SCSCMS-Dormitory）,and examine its reliability and validity.Methods A total of 579 college students completed a battery of questionnaires including SCSCMS-Dormitory and the Self-structure Scale.Results The SCSCMS-Dormitory consisted of 78 items and 11 subscales.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the hypothesized eleven-factor model fitted the data well（χ2/df=3.23,P〈0.05,NFI=0.95,NNFI=0.96,IFI=0.96,CFI=0.96,RMSEA=0.07）.Consistent with hypothesis,the subscales of SCSCMS-Dormitory were significantly related to two subscales of the Self-construals Scale.The Cronbach α of the whole scale was 0.97,and those of subscales were between 0.76 and 0.92.Conclusion The Scale of College Students’ Conflict Management Styles in Dormitory Setting is reliable and valid.

关 键 词：冲突管理方式 信度 效度 大学生 宿舍 

分 类 号：R122.2[医药卫生—环境卫生学]