检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胥丽[1] 贾长海[1] 肖苓蓉[1] 潘敏[1] 毕长虹[1] 王艳[1]
出 处:《医学理论与实践》2012年第12期1439-1440,共2页The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的:探讨院前急救护理干预对急性心肌梗死患者预后的影响。方法:将接受院前急救护理的68例AMI患者(观察组)与自行入院的70例患者(对照组)的抢救治疗及护理干预结果进行对照。结果:和对照组比较,观察组溶栓时间、住院时间均短(P<0.05),入院前和入院后死亡率低(P<0.05),存活率高(P<0.05)。结论:院前急救以及相应的护理干预可以缩短治疗和住院时间,节约医疗资源,提高了患者存活率。Objective:To discuss the effect of pre-hospital emergency care intervention on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods: Therapy and nursing intervention results of 68 cases of AMI received pre- hospital emergency care(observe group) and 70 cases of self-admitted to hospital (control group) were studied. Results.. Compared with control group, thrombolysis time and hospital stay time of observe group were shorter(P〈0. 05), mor- tality of both pre-admission and after admission was significantly lower(P〈0.05) and survival rate was higher(P〈 0. 05). Conclusion: The pre-hospital emergency care intervention could shorten treatment and hospitalization time, save health care resources and improve patient survival.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117