检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学长海医院急诊科,上海200433
出 处:《解放军护理杂志》2012年第11期74-76,共3页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
摘 要:目的探讨经口气管插管安全、舒适、有效的固定方法。方法方便性抽样选取2010年5月至2011年11月在长海医院急诊科行经口气管插管患者64例,随机分成两组,分别采用传统蝶形胶布固定法(传统组)和改良蝶形胶布固定法(改良组)。观察两组患者在插管后气管插管移位情况、患者舒适度以及皮肤黏膜并发症发生率的差别。结果改良组在气管插管移位、皮肤黏膜并发症发生率等方面低于传统组,舒适度优于传统组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论经口气管插管非口角处交叉蝶形胶布固定法明显优于传统蝶形胶布交叉固定法,可在临床护理中推广应用。Objective To investigate a safe,comfort and effective method of fixation for oral endotracheal intubation.Methods From May 2010 to November 2011,64 patients underwent orotracheal intubation were randomly divided into two groups: group A and group B.The traditional fixation of butterfly-shaped adhesive for fixation was adopted in group A,and the improved fixation of butterfly-shaped adhesive for fixation was adopted in group B.The incidence of displacement,degree of comfort and incidence of skin complications of the two groups were compared.Results The incidence of displacement and incidence of skin complications were significantly lower in group A than which in group B;the degree of comfort of group A was superior to that in group B(P〈0.05).Conclusion The improved fixed method is more effective in oral endotracheal intubation compared with the traditional fixed method,which is worth of being promoted in the clinical nursing practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.195.190