检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林叶春[1] 曾昭海[1] 任长忠[2] 李志坚[3] 郭来春[2] 杨学超[1] 王春龙[2] 钱欣[1] 胡跃高[1]
机构地区:[1]中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100193 [2]吉林省白城市农业科学院,吉林白城137000 [3]东北师范大学草地科学研究所,吉林长春130024
出 处:《作物学报》2012年第6期1062-1070,共9页Acta Agronomica Sinica
基 金:中国农业大学"研究生科研创新专项"(KYCX2010031);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设项目(CARS-08-B-1);国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(nyhyzx07-009-2)资助
摘 要:为探讨局部根区不同灌溉方式下裸燕麦(Avena nuda L.)光合能力下降的生理机制,采用盆栽及渗水盘供水方法,比较了交替根区灌溉(APRI)、固定根区灌溉(FPRI)和常规灌溉(CTRI)下,裸燕麦旗叶相对叶绿素含量(SPAD值)、光合特征曲线及叶绿素荧光动力学特性的差异。与CTRI处理相比,局部根区灌溉(包括APRI和FPRI处理)降低了叶片SPAD值、净光合速率(Pn)和初始羧化速率(CE),但APRI处理未明显降低初始量子效率(α)、PSII最大量子效率(Fv/Fm)、PSII实际光化学效率(ФPSII)、电子传递效率(ETR)和光化学效率(qP)。在2种局部根区灌溉模式中,APRI较FPRI显著提高了叶片SPAD值(P<0.05),而且APRI的叶片最大净光合速率(Pmax)、α、光饱和点(LSP)、光能利用率(LUE)、Ci/Ca、CE、CO2饱和点(Ci,sat)、初始荧光(Fo)、最大荧光(Fm)、ФPSII、ETR、qP和非光化学效率(NPQ)均高于FPRI。APRI和FPRI的光合速率降低与气孔因素有关,FPRI光合速率降低还与PSII结构损伤有关;局部根区灌溉提高了裸燕麦干旱胁迫逆境下的耐受能力,APRI有利于保持更高的光合速率。The objective of this study was to provide experimental evidence for photosynthetic mechanism under drought stress and practical technique of water-saving irrigation in naked oat (Avena nuda L.). In a pot experiment with instrument to control root zone irrigation and water amount, the effects on relative chlorophyll content (SPAD), photosynthetic curves, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were compared among irrigation models of alternative partial root zone irrigation (APRI), fixed partial root zone irrigation (FPRI), and conventional total root zone irrigation (CTRI). Compared to CTRI, partial root zone irrigation, including APRI and FPRI treatments, decreased leaf SPAD, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), and carboxylation efficiency (CE); how- ever, APRI had no obvious effects on reducing initial quantum efficiency (ct), maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), actual photochemical efficiency of PSII (Фpull), apparent electron transport rate (ETR), and photochemical quenching coefficient (qp). The leaf SPAD of APRI was significantly enhanced compared to that of FPRI (P〈0.05), and the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pmax),α, light saturation point (LSP), light use efficiency (LUE), Ci/Ca, CE, CO2 saturation point (Ci.sat), Fo, Fro, tgpsn, ETR, qp, and NPQ were all higher in APRI than in FPRI. The reduction of Pn in partial root zone irrigation treatments resulted from stomatal factors, and structural damage of photosynthetic system II (PSII) was found in FPRI treatment. Clearly, partial root zone irrigation can improve the tolerance ability of naked oat against drought stress; particularly, APRI has the effect to maintain higher Pn than FPRI.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222