检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢黎伟[1]
机构地区:[1]福建江夏学院,福建福州350108
出 处:《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第4期66-75,共10页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:随着知识产权作用和价值的提升,知识产权融资担保日益得到重视和发展。美国知识产权担保制度由联邦法和州法构成,州法采用简便快捷的UCC担保交易制度,而联邦法则相对滞后。但在两法中何者应优先适用的问题上,存在较大争议和分歧,因而造成法律适用上的不确定。本文分析美国知识产权融资担保制度的现状和利弊得失后,反思我国相关制度的现状,并提出相应的改革建议。With the increasing of the role and value of intellectual property,secured financing for intellectual property has developed and has been emphasized.American guarantee system of intellectual property consists of federal statutes and state laws,and state laws adopt simple and efficient UCC system,however,federal statutes are lagging behind.But whether federal statutes should preempt state laws is unclear,as a result,the application of secured financing law is uncertain.This article analyzes the present situation as well as advantages and disadvantages of secured financing system of intellectual property in the US,introspects the relevant system in China and puts forward corresponding reform proposals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222