中文版慢性疼痛自我效能感量表用于老年癌痛病人的信效度研究  

Reliability and Validity of CPSS Chinese Version in Elderly Patients with Cancer Pain

作　　者：刘美凤[1] 李福霞[1] 于翠华[1] 姜光红[1] 吕志宏[1] 孟祥文[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学附属省立医院,山东济南250021

出　　处：《护理学报》2012年第12期11-13,共3页Journal of Nursing（China）

摘　　要：目的探讨慢性疼痛自我效能感量表(Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale,CPSS)应用于老年癌痛病人的信、效度。方法经作者同意后,将英文版的CPSS翻译、修订后,制定中文版的CPSS,对211例老年癌痛病人施测,检验量表的内部一致性信度、Guttmann分半信度、重测信度、内容效度、预测效度和校标效度。结果量表的内部一致性信度(Cronbach’sα)系数是0.896,3个分量表是0.785～0.863;Guttmann分半信度是0.763～0.896,重测信度是0.810～0.902,分量表与总量表的相关系数是0.755～0.872。总量表和各分量表与NRS评分的相关系数-0.450～-0.263;因子分析中产生3个公因子,即疼痛管理自我效能感、躯体性自我效能感、症状应对自我效能感,共能解释总体方差的76.83%,项目的因子载荷值为0.435～0.854。结论中文版的CPSS应用于老年癌痛病人具有较高的信、效度。Objective To study the reliability and validity of the Chronic Pain Serf-Efficacy Scale （CPSS） in elderly patients with cancer pain. Methods A total of 211 elderly patients with cancer pain were surveyed with CPSS Chinese version, the results of which were analyzed for its reliability and validity study. Results ct coefficients of 3 sub-scales were 0.785~0.863 and Guttmann The total Cronbach＇s oL coefficient was 0.896, and the Cronbach＇s split-half reliability was 0.763-0.896. Meanwhile, test-retest reliability was 0.810-0.902 and the correlation coefficient of subscales and total scale were 0.755~0.872. The correlation coefficients of score of subscales and total scale with the NRS were -0.450--0.263. Factor analysis generated three common factors： PSE （Self- Efficacy for Pain Management）, FSE （Serf-Efficacy for Physical Function） and CSE （Serf-Efficacy for Coping with symptoms）, which were able to explain the overall variance of 76.83% and the factor loading values of item were 0.435-0.854. Conclusion There are high reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CPSS in elderly cancer patients with pain.

关 键 词：慢性疼痛自我效能感量表 中文版 老年 癌症疼痛 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R473.73[医药卫生—护理学] R592[医药卫生—临床医学]