检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华哮喘杂志(电子版)》2012年第3期23-25,共3页Chinese Journal of Asthma(Electronic Version)
摘 要:目的探讨心理干预对支气管哮喘(简称哮喘)患者负性情绪及生存质量的影响。方法 68例哮喘患者分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组在常规治疗基础上给予心理干预措施,对照组给予常规治疗,比较治疗前后Zung氏自评抑郁量表(SDS)、Zung氏自评焦虑量表(SAS)评分及哮喘生存质量评估表(asthma quality of life questionnaire,AQLQ)评分,并作出科学评估。结果①治疗6个月后,治疗组治疗前后患者焦虑与抑郁值明显降低,与对照组治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②治疗6个月后,治疗组活动受限、哮喘症状、心理状况、对刺激源反应、对自身健康关心各维度的得分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论心理干预能够改善哮喘患者负性情绪及生存质量。Objective To explore effects of psychological intervention on negative emotionalstate and quality of life of the patients with bronchial asthma (asthma). Methods 68 cases of patients with asthma were divided into treatment group and control group. The former were given treatment on the basis of treatment and care given to psychological intervention measures and the latter were given routine treatment and care measures. And then compared Zungrs self-rating depression scale (SDS), Zung's self- rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores and and asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) scores before and after the treatment ,conducting scientific assessments. Results (1)The value of anxiety and depression of the treament group reduced significantly ( P〈0.05) compared with the control group after 6 months of treatment. (2)The activity limitation, asthma symptoms, psychological status, the source of stimulation reflected the dimensions of their own health care scores of the treament group were higher compared with the control group after 6 months of treatment ( P 〈0. 05). Conclusions Psychological intervention can improve negative emotion and quality of life of asthma patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117