检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾毅[1] 谢伟乾[1] 蒋春晖[2] 覃夏婵 梁汉钦[1] 易洁梅[1]
机构地区:[1]广西贵港市人民医院,广西贵港537100 [2]广西贵港市中西医结合骨科医院,广西贵港537100 [3]广西贵港市覃塘区人民医院,广西贵港537100
出 处:《华夏医学》2012年第2期224-228,共5页Acta Medicinae Sinica
摘 要:目的:了解医务人员对药品不良反应(ADR)报告工作的认知情况,进一步促进ADR报告工作的开展。方法:采用统一的问卷,选取3家医院共500名一线医务人员进行ADR报告工作认知情况调查,对问卷各项内容进行统计、分析。结果:回收有效问卷393份,有效回收率78.60%。调查显示仅有49.36%的医务人员上报过ADR,32.06%没有从相关资讯中获取过ADR信息,63.36%的医务人员不清楚我国是否有关于ADR的法律条款,55.73%的医务人员错误地认为ADR与医疗质量是有关的。结论:调查显示年轻医务人员对ADR报告工作知晓率不高,对ADR法律法规认识不足,对待ADR的工作态度有待加强。应建立对医务人员进行长期培训和宣传ADR报告相关知识的有效机制,提高ADR监测水平。Objective: To understand the medical staff' s r tion (ADR) so as to further promote the development epo of rt cognitive aspects to adverse drug reacreport work. Methods: All together 500 front line medical staff in 3 hospitals were conducted survey on the report cognitive aspects of ADR with the same questionnaire. All the content in the questionnaire were statistically analyzed. Resuits:393 copies of valid questionnaire were collected with an effective rate of 78.60%. The survey indicated that there was only 49.36% of the medical personnel had reported ADR,32.06% had never obtained any ADR information from the related information, 63.36 did not know whether there were any clause on ADR,and 55.73% mistakenly believed that ADR was related to medical health care quality. Conclusion:The survey shows that young medical staff have low awareness of knowl- edge about ADR report work,insufficient understanding of ADR laws and regulations. Their attitudes toward ADR work need strengthened. Long-term training and effective publicity mechanism of the related knowledge about ADR report should be established to improve the ADR monitoring level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249