检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘淑娟[1] 梁伟强[1] 陈宇宏[1] 张金明[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院整形外科,广州市510120
出 处:《中国激光医学杂志》2012年第3期152-154,共3页Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine & Surgery
基 金:国家自然基金资助课题(30901783)
摘 要:目的比较长脉宽Nd∶YAG激光和强脉冲光对国人唇部脱毛的疗效和安全性。方法采用自身对照,对20例受试者两侧唇部分别采用Nd∶YAG激光与强脉冲光进行唇部脱毛治疗,间隔4~6周,治疗4次后分析脱毛效果、患者满意度和不良反应。结果 4次治疗后随访4个月,Nd∶YAG激光脱毛和强脉冲光脱毛的唇毛清除率分别为78.2%和52.5%(P<0.01)。Nd∶YAG激光脱毛后色素沉着和水疱发生率低于强脉冲光脱毛。Nd∶YAG激光脱毛受试者的满意度评分优于强脉冲光脱毛。结论长脉宽Nd∶YAG激光唇部脱毛的效果和安全性优于强脉冲光脱毛。Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of lip hair removal with long-pulsed 1064nm Nd∶YAG laser and intensive pulse light(IPL). Methods Twenty patient were treated with Cynosure 1064nm Nd∶YAG laser on one half of their lip hairs and IPL on the other half,and the efficacy,side effect and patient satisfaction degree were compared after 4 times of treatment. Results The four months' follow-up after the treatment of 4 times showed that the lip hair removal rates in the 1064nm Nd∶YAG group and IPL group were 78.2% and 52.5%(P0.01) respectively.The 1064nm Nd∶YAG laser group had less side effects such as pigmentation and blister than the IPL group.Patients were more satisfied with Nd∶YAG laser than with IPL(7.9 vs 5.2). Conclusions Long-pulsed 1064nm Nd∶YAG laser is more safe and effective than IPL in removing lip hair.
分 类 号:R758.6[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学] R622[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3