检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学资源与安全工程学院,湖南长沙410083 [2]福州大学环境与资源学院,福建福州350108
出 处:《自然灾害学报》2012年第3期7-14,共8页Journal of Natural Disasters
基 金:国家"十一五"科技支撑计划课题资助(2006BAK04B03-02);中南大学研究生学位论文创新基金资助(1960-71131100023);福州大学人才引进基金资助(022409)
摘 要:安全规划是一个复杂动态系统的运行过程,对其方法学进行分析思考有助于探索安全规划方法的统一体系。在国内外有关安全规划研究的基础上,给出了安全规划的定义及一般特点,建立了安全规划的一般程序,包括安全规划的指导思想、基本方针、基本原则、目标及内容等。基于现有的系统工程方法论,探讨了安全规划的方法学及理论基础。最后,综述了现有安全规划的具体方法,包括安全距离法、基于后果法及基于风险法,并对该3种方法进行了比较及评价。可供安全科学与工程学科研究参考。Safety planning is a functioning process of a complex dynamic system. Study on its methodology is helpful to explore the unite system of safety planning methods. Based on the present research of safety planning around the world, this study proposed a definition and general characteristics of safety planning and established the general procedures of safety planning, which include the guiding ideology, basic policy and principles, the targets and con- tents of safety planning. Based on the existing methodology of system engineering, the basic theories of safety plan- ning were summarized. At last, the detailed methods of safety planning were reviewed, including ' generic' dis- tances, consequence-based approach, and risk-based approach, which were analyzed and compared each other. These give a reference to research on science of safety and engineering.
分 类 号:X913.4[环境科学与工程—安全科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117